RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

Ron Paul Update - #12 - His Views on Free Trade

In our previous Updates we published Ron Paul’s views on various topics from Crime, Drugs, , Education, the Environment and . In this update we will continue with Paul’s views on .

Ron Paul on Free Trade

 

 

China trade not contingent on human rights & product safety

Q: Sarah Lu was forced to work in labor camps for six years, for the crime of being a Christian house church leader. Thousands of prisoners of conscience are forced to manufacture items that stock our American shelves. Would you make future trade with China contingent on them measurably improving their record on religious freedom & human rights?

A: NO

No NAFTA Superhighway from Canada to Mexico

Q: As president, do you support the NAFTA "Superhighway" presently under construction from Mexico to Canada, portions of which shall be under foreign control?

A: NO

NAFTA superhighway threatens widespread eminent domain

Today, we face a new threat of widespread eminent domain actions as a result of powerful interests who want to build a NAFTA superhighway through the United States from Mexico to Canada. Property rights are the foundation of all rights in a free society. Without the right to own a printing press, for example, freedom of the press becomes meaningless. The next president must get federal agencies out of these schemes to deny property owners their constitutional rights to life, liberty, and property.

Voted NO on implementing CAFTA, Central America Free Trade.

To implement the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement. A vote of YES would:

  • Progressively eliminate customs duties on all originating goods traded among the participating nations
  • Preserve U.S. duties on imports of sugar goods over a certain quota
  • Remove duties on textile and apparel goods traded among participating nations
  • Prohibit export subsidies for agricultural goods traded among participating nations
  • Provide for cooperation among participating nations on customs laws and import licensing procedures
  • Encourage each participating nation to adopt and enforce laws ensuring high levels of sanitation and environmental protection
  • Recommend that each participating nation uphold the International Labor Organization Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work
  • Urge each participating nation to obey various international agreements regarding intellectual property rights

Voted NO on implementing US-Australia Free Trade Agreement.

United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act: implementing free trade with protections for the domestic textile and apparel industries.

Voted NO on implementing US-Singapore free trade agreement.

Vote to pass a bill that would put into effect a trade agreement between the United States and Singapore. The trade agreement would reduce tariffs and trade barriers between the United States and Singapore. The agreement would remove tariffs on goods and duties on textiles, and open markets for services The agreement would also establish intellectual property, environmental and labor standards.

Voted NO on implementing free trade agreement with Chile.

United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act: Vote to pass a bill that would put into effect a trade agreement between the US and Chile. The agreement would reduce tariffs and trade barriers between the US and Chile. The trade pact would decrease duties and tariffs on agricultural and textile products. It would also open markets for services. The trade pact would establish intellectual property safeguards and would call for enforcement of environmental and labor standards.

Voted YES on withdrawing from the WTO.

Vote on withdrawing Congressional approval from the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization [WTO].

Voted NO on ‘Fast Track’ authority for trade agreements.

Vote to establish negotiating objectives for trade agreements between the United States and foreign countries and renew ‘fast track’ authority for the President.

No restrictions on import/export; but maintain sovereignty .

Paul adopted the Republican Liberty Caucus Position Statement:

  • WHEREAS libertarian Republicans believe in limited government, individual freedom and personal responsibility;
  • WHEREAS we believe that government has no money nor power not derived from the consent of the people;
  • WHEREAS we believe that people have the right to keep the fruits of their labor; and
  • WHEREAS we believe in upholding the US Constitution as the supreme law of the land;

BE IT RESOLVED that the Republican Liberty Caucus endorses the following [among its] principles:

  1. The US government should inhibit neither the exportation of US goods and services worldwide, nor the importation of goods and services.
  2. The United States should not be answerable to any governing body outside the United States for its trade policy.

End economic protectionism: let dairy compacts expire .

Paul sponsored the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact resolution:

Declares that the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact should be allowed to expire under its own terms on September 30, 2001. Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that Article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution should not be used to renew the interstate economic protectionism of our Nation’s early history.

Block international highway from Canada to Mexico

RON PAUL MAKING A POINTQ: You charged at the YouTube debate that eminent domain would be used to build a new international highway from Canada through the US down to Mexico, suggesting that maybe there was a plan to create some sort of North American Union, similar to the European Union. That is now being denied by a lot of folks in Washington, including a spokesman for the Federal Highway Administration, saying: "There is no such super highway like the one he’s talking about. It doesn’t exist in plans or anywhere else."

A: We have a bill in the Congress to stop all of the funding for this particular highway, and I think we have over 50 co-sponsors of it. To be in denial of this, that this is not planned, they’re not going to admit it. It’s subtle. They’ll say, we are just improving highways. But how come they had a meeting in April 2005 with the president of Mexico, the US & Canada, and they talk about these things? They do believe in globalism. So I don’t think there is any doubt about the plans.

No North American Union; no WTO; no UN

Q: Will you abolish all plans to promote economic integration of North America?

A: Not only do I not want a North American Union, I want us out of the U.N., the IMF, the World Bank, the WTO, NAFTA and CAFTA. NAFTA has nothing to do for free trade. It’s a pretense to lower tariffs, but it’s a reason to go talk to the WTO to raise tariffs. We need free trade. That’s very, very important. But you don’t get that by world government.

Inappropriate to impose sanctions for persecuting Christians

Q: Today, Christians are being beaten, jailed, and expelled throughout the Muslim world. In Saudi Arabia, no church buildings are permitted, yet Saudi extremist Wahhabis have built hundreds of mosques in the US with funding from Saudi Arabia. If elected, will you take action to protest these gross injustices and persecution by denying visas or imposing trade sanctions?

A: NO

 

READ ON FOR MORE ON RON PAUL’S “REAL DEAL”


Trackback URL

  1. 2 Comment(s)

  2. By unlawflcombatnt on Dec 28, 2007 | Reply

    I completely agree with Paul about withdrawing from the WTO, NAFTA, and all other free trade agreements. I further agree that we should end Presidential Fast-Track authority. Congress, not the President, has the power to negotiate U.S. trade.

    However, unlike Paul, I believe the United States should protect it’s jobs and industries from destruction from outsourcing of American jobs to foreign countries. Once again, only Congress should have the authority to regulate international trade. But if it’s necessary to impose tariffs on imported goods–especially those made by American-owned countries who’ve replaced American workers with cheaper foreign workers to save labor costs–then I’m in favor of tariffs. But the 1st step to even impose tariffs, is to withdraw from the WTO & NAFTA. Again, this is where I comletely agree with Ron Paul.

  3. By bkgiwr on Nov 4, 2009 | Reply

    QRFBYB wttlnsrfdwlo, [url=http://nyyyehbnzjcy.com/]nyyyehbnzjcy[/url], [link=http://iwrbzyrdyzxx.com/]iwrbzyrdyzxx[/link], http://jzyykxnxxpla.com/

  1. 1 Trackback(s)

  2. Jan 19, 2008: Ron Paul - #21 - Tax Reform |

Post a Comment

Inquisitive Minds

GOOGLE PageRank CHECKER

Powered by Yahoo! Answers