Ron Paul Update - #18 - His Views on Jobs
By Michael Lang on Jan 6, 2008 in 2008 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN
In our previous Updates we published Ron Paul’s views on various topics from Crime, , Education, the Environment, and Foreign Policy. In this update we will continue with Paul’s views on Jobs.
Ron Paul on Jobs
Right to organize; but no special benefits for unions
Q: Are unions good for
A: The right to unionize should be a basic right of any group. You should be able to organize. You should have no privileges, no special benefits legislated to benefit the unions, but you should never deny any working group to organize and negotiate for the best set of standards of working conditions.
Minimum wage takes away opportunities, especially for blacks
Q: In 2006, the unemployment rate of Black high school graduates was 33% higher than the unemployment rate for white high school drop outs. What do you think accounts for that inequity?
A: Walter Williams, a very astute free-market economist, has studied this extensively, and he has found that prior to minimum wage laws there was no discrepancy like this. So he put a lot of blame on the minimum wage law. Once government gets interfering, this takes away opportunities. And I believe there is a lot of truth to this because it eliminates an opportunity and a chance for a marginal worker. I have a bill in that might help a lot of people, Black or white or whomever. I have a bill in that would immediately help these people who are trying to get a start, that they would never have to pay any taxes or payroll taxes, if they just happen to be a waiter or a waitress, to give them a chance to get ahead and get a good job.
No "sexual orientation" in Employment Non-Discrimination Act
Q: I own a motion picture film lab that came under fire by the Arlington Human Rights Commission because I refused to duplicate objectionable pro-homosexual material. Would you protect business owners like me from being forced to violate our moral conscience by vetoing the so-called "Employment Non-Discrimination Act" that would add the phrase "sexual orientation" into federal law?
A: YES
Voted NO on restricting employer interference in union organizing
To enable employees to form & join labor organizations, and to provide for mandatory injunctions for unfair labor practices during organizing efforts. Requires investigation that an employer:
- discharged or discriminated against an employee to discourage membership in a labor organization;
- threatened to discharge employees in the exercise of guaranteed collective bargaining rights; and
- adds to remedies for such violations: back pay plus liquidated damages; and additional civil penalties.
Opponents support voting NO because:
Democracy itself is placed at risk by this bill. The sanctity of the secret ballot is the backbone of our democratic process. Not one voter signed a card to send us here to Congress. None of us sent our campaign workers out to voters’ houses armed with candidate information & a stack of authorization cards. No. We trusted democracy. We trusted the voters to cast their ballots like adults, freely, openly, without intimidation, and we live with the results. But here we are, poised to advance legislation to kill a secret ballot process.
Let’s be clear. Every American has the right to organize. No one is debating that. This is a right we believe in so strongly we have codified it and made it possible for workers to do so through a secret ballot.
Voted NO on increasing minimum wage to $7.25
Increase the federal minimum wage to:
- $5.85 an hour, beginning on the 60th day after enactment;
- $6.55 an hour, beginning 12 months after that 60th day; and
- $7.25 an hour, beginning 24 months after that 60th day.
Opponents support voting NO because:
This bill is marked more by what is not in the bill than what is in it. Small businesses are the backbone of our economy. They create two-thirds of our Nation’s new jobs, and they represent 98% of the new businesses in the
We can do better. In the interest of sending the President a final measure that provides consideration for small businesses and their workers, the very men and women who are responsible for our economy’s recent growth and strength, we must do better.
Voted NO on $167B over 10 years for farm price supports
Vote to authorize $167 billion over ten years for farm price supports, food aid and rural development. Payments would be made on a countercyclical program, meaning they would increase as prices dropped. Conservation acreage payments would be retained.
Voted YES on zero-funding OSHA’s Ergonomics Rules instead of $4.5B
Vote to pass a resolution to give no enforcement authority or power to ergonomics rules submitted by the Labor Department during the Clinton Administration. These rules would force businesses to take steps to prevent work-related repetitive stress disorders.
Member of the Congressional Rural Caucus
Paul is a member of the Congressional Rural Caucus
The Congressional Rural Caucus (CRC) is a bipartisan coalition of Members of Congress who are committed to helping agricultural and rural
In our previous Updates we published Ron Paul’s views on various topics from Crime, , Education, the Environment, and Foreign Policy. In this update we will continue with Paul’s views on Jobs.



1 Comment(s)
By wkotramxx on Nov 4, 2009 | Reply
tEFICf olgqezrzuzrt, [url=http://hoygsvjsdqhr.com/]hoygsvjsdqhr[/url], [link=http://dusobtgdqpeb.com/]dusobtgdqpeb[/link], http://rdlzzkfsnxbc.com/