<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop Loss &#8211; Bush&#8217;s Infamous Back-door Draft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelangreport.com/behavior-doesnt-lie/stop-loss-bushs-infamous-back-door-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelangreport.com/behavior-doesnt-lie/stop-loss-bushs-infamous-back-door-draft/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=stop-loss-bushs-infamous-back-door-draft</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 16:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.thelangreport.com/behavior-doesnt-lie/stop-loss-bushs-infamous-back-door-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 04:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelangreport.com/?p=411#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>Why would a government adopt a policy of stop loss after a major conflcit. It&#039;s brutal on our forces whether it&#039;s being discloused or not. I don&#039;t agree with the policy because it&#039;s socialst in nature. When secret societies dictate our war policies so that their children are excluded from war , we have abandoned our democratic process to allow a submersive process of collusion to dictate our nations 
political policies. Don&#039;t we have a right to know how our government works ? 

Is the military program of Stop Loss directly related to the repercussion of Watergate and should these policies be halted ? When Mark Felt { Deep Throat }  leaked the information that a policy of war had been signed into our Executive that would exclude certain members and sectors of our society from having to serve in the military , are the current policies of Stop Loss what they had in mind ? Although the Stop Loss policy has some redeeming benefits , it&#039;s long term goals are mainly responsible for the fatigue and exhaustion of our current troops. The personal effort in the military has become so desperate that you have some soldiers serving in war zones while taking psychological medications and sleeping pills. Considering the long and short term effects of this policy , it appears genocidal in nature and unfair to the military personnel that have so boldly volunteered to serve and defend our country. Please take a minute through the holiday season and think about the people defending your nation and write your legislators and demand the program of Stop Loss be stopped. 

Reference = All The President&#039;s Men / Un Censored - Warner Editions 1st Edition - ( Simon And Shuster are all Censored ) 
Reported that Mark Felt Leaked that A System To Delete The Need For War was signed into the Executive and that a Black Operational Government had been incorporated into our government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would a government adopt a policy of stop loss after a major conflcit. It&#8217;s brutal on our forces whether it&#8217;s being discloused or not. I don&#8217;t agree with the policy because it&#8217;s socialst in nature. When secret societies dictate our war policies so that their children are excluded from war , we have abandoned our democratic process to allow a submersive process of collusion to dictate our nations<br />
political policies. Don&#8217;t we have a right to know how our government works ? </p>
<p>Is the military program of Stop Loss directly related to the repercussion of Watergate and should these policies be halted ? When Mark Felt { Deep Throat }  leaked the information that a policy of war had been signed into our Executive that would exclude certain members and sectors of our society from having to serve in the military , are the current policies of Stop Loss what they had in mind ? Although the Stop Loss policy has some redeeming benefits , it&#8217;s long term goals are mainly responsible for the fatigue and exhaustion of our current troops. The personal effort in the military has become so desperate that you have some soldiers serving in war zones while taking psychological medications and sleeping pills. Considering the long and short term effects of this policy , it appears genocidal in nature and unfair to the military personnel that have so boldly volunteered to serve and defend our country. Please take a minute through the holiday season and think about the people defending your nation and write your legislators and demand the program of Stop Loss be stopped. </p>
<p>Reference = All The President&#8217;s Men / Un Censored &#8211; Warner Editions 1st Edition &#8211; ( Simon And Shuster are all Censored )<br />
Reported that Mark Felt Leaked that A System To Delete The Need For War was signed into the Executive and that a Black Operational Government had been incorporated into our government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.thelangreport.com/behavior-doesnt-lie/stop-loss-bushs-infamous-back-door-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-6059</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelangreport.com/?p=411#comment-6059</guid>
		<description>Jacob, thank you for your comment. There is little that I can disagree with except for the fact that many of the people signing the contract are young, wide-eyed men and women that either haven&#039;t thought it through or maybe believed that they would deal with it when the time arrived.
Also, there is little doubt that this administration couldn&#039;t care less about the well being of our soldiers. They have demonstrated this over and over again.
I do appreciate the service that your brother is providing but he and everyone else is fighting a war based on a pile of lies.
I hope he returns home safe, sound and whole.

Michael Lang
Publisher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob, thank you for your comment. There is little that I can disagree with except for the fact that many of the people signing the contract are young, wide-eyed men and women that either haven&#8217;t thought it through or maybe believed that they would deal with it when the time arrived.<br />
Also, there is little doubt that this administration couldn&#8217;t care less about the well being of our soldiers. They have demonstrated this over and over again.<br />
I do appreciate the service that your brother is providing but he and everyone else is fighting a war based on a pile of lies.<br />
I hope he returns home safe, sound and whole.</p>
<p>Michael Lang<br />
Publisher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.thelangreport.com/behavior-doesnt-lie/stop-loss-bushs-infamous-back-door-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-6042</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelangreport.com/?p=411#comment-6042</guid>
		<description>Youâ€™re so stupid. You have no idea what youâ€™re talking about. Stop loss was created after the Vietnam War and was used first in 1991. Its wrong, Ill give you that, but everyone who signs the contract knows itâ€™s a possibility. The fact is, its necessary, there isnâ€™t a huge number of soldiers being stop lossed and the ones who are, are highly trained, highly skilled and hard to replace. Get the facts straight before to start ranting about something you donâ€™t know. I have a brother in the Army, and under stop loss orders. Itâ€™s a bummer and sucks, but he know it was possible, knew its for the betterment of the country and is proud to do it. Youâ€™re just a liberal dumb ass who should go to Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youâ€™re so stupid. You have no idea what youâ€™re talking about. Stop loss was created after the Vietnam War and was used first in 1991. Its wrong, Ill give you that, but everyone who signs the contract knows itâ€™s a possibility. The fact is, its necessary, there isnâ€™t a huge number of soldiers being stop lossed and the ones who are, are highly trained, highly skilled and hard to replace. Get the facts straight before to start ranting about something you donâ€™t know. I have a brother in the Army, and under stop loss orders. Itâ€™s a bummer and sucks, but he know it was possible, knew its for the betterment of the country and is proud to do it. Youâ€™re just a liberal dumb ass who should go to Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

