“So, even if Barack Obama is using anything to increase his chances of getting his message across to Americans in order to win their confidence and votes, what’s sinister about that?

Interpreting it as anything else is just plain stupid and ignorant,” you say.

However, what is your explanation for the remark Obama made in one of his speeches (a remark that the so-called “mainstream” media has completely buried) that the clouds would open and we’d hear a “voice” telling us that we “must vote for Obama” after having an “epiphany.” Senator Clinton even alluded to Obama’s weird remark in a speech of hers.

Are we “stupid and ignorant” to notice that the Senator from Illinois talks weird?

So, tell me what is intelligent about a candidate telling us we’ll “hear voices” telling us to vote for him after heavens have opened?

Obama managed to get himself elected. Whether hypnotic devices helped tip the scales or not is something for historians to figure out. Presumably a later generation looking at this question won’t be so “in the bag” for Mr. Obama as his “fans” are today.

However, an objective observer might still note that Senator Obama is the least experienced man ever to win the office of president.

That isn’t evidence to support hypnosis, but it is evidence of something unfortunate — and it doesn’t say much about the candidate, his supporters, or a completely biased news media.