http://www.thelangreport.com/religion-or-lack-of/creationism-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-as-science/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=creationism-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-as-science Sat, 21 May 2011 16:22:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 http://www.thelangreport.com/religion-or-lack-of/creationism-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-as-science/comment-page-1/#comment-10586 SpeerSword Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:13:13 +0000 http://www.thelangreport.com/religion-or-lack-of/creationism-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-as-science/#comment-10586 Creationism is not a theory, it is a made up story where the only proof is 'Prove that it didn't happen'. Evolution has nothing to do with the creation of the world or life or anything. It basically says that life 'evolves' through natural selection, which is living things that have traits that are more sutiable to survive will reproduce and eventually that trait will become dominant through out the species. Don't comment unless you are informed, k thx. Creationism is not a theory, it is a made up story where the only proof is ‘Prove that it didn’t happen’. Evolution has nothing to do with the creation of the world or life or anything. It basically says that life ‘evolves’ through natural selection, which is living things that have traits that are more sutiable to survive will reproduce and eventually that trait will become dominant through out the species. Don’t comment unless you are informed, k thx.

]]> http://www.thelangreport.com/religion-or-lack-of/creationism-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-as-science/comment-page-1/#comment-6366 Valerie Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:15:30 +0000 http://www.thelangreport.com/religion-or-lack-of/creationism-is-not-science-and-should-not-be-taught-as-science/#comment-6366 Evolution is NOT science, and should not be taught in schools! Is there any concrete proof that anything evolved, that is from nothing to something? (Of course "evolution" takes place everyday, but not from the goo to form. More so it takes place in situations like I sat in the sun too long so now my hair is bleached more than yesterday.) Where are all the in between species? Oh, maybe they found so called "Lucy," but she flunked the test. There is NO absolute proof for evolution, just as there is NO absolute proof that everything was designed by a creator. So, why don't we teach both in school, and call them THEORIES, which is what they are. No need to get all worked up. And, if you look at life especially at the molecular level, I'd say it looks incredibly complex and orderly to me. Not so much like a big bang or bunch of goo swirled together. Why get so hot and bothered by another theory being presented? Children should be able to decide for themselves. Evolution is NOT science, and should not be taught in schools! Is there any concrete proof that anything evolved, that is from nothing to something? (Of course “evolution” takes place everyday, but not from the goo to form. More so it takes place in situations like I sat in the sun too long so now my hair is bleached more than yesterday.) Where are all the in between species? Oh, maybe they found so called “Lucy,” but she flunked the test. There is NO absolute proof for evolution, just as there is NO absolute proof that everything was designed by a creator. So, why don’t we teach both in school, and call them THEORIES, which is what they are. No need to get all worked up. And, if you look at life especially at the molecular level, I’d say it looks incredibly complex and orderly to me. Not so much like a big bang or bunch of goo swirled together. Why get so hot and bothered by another theory being presented? Children should be able to decide for themselves.

]]>